Disciplining Biopolitical Subjectivity through Prosthetic Affective Memory in Never Let Me Go
DOWNLOAD PDFMengying Wei
School of Foreign Languages (SFL), Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go depicts the tragic fate of clones in a dystopian society and can be read as a political novel exploring power and oppression through Giorgio Agamben’s biopolitics. Drawing on Alison Landsberg’s concept of prosthetic memory and Sara Ahmed’s theory of affective politics, this study examines how memory and emotion function as tools of control and discipline that manage clone lives and deprive them of autonomy. Pain and love, instead of helping them understand or challenge their fate, are manufactured emotional bonds among clones; implanted memories thus become tools that soften the reality of their exploitation. This mechanism not only legitimizes oppression but also masks its inhumanity through sentiment and aesthetics, allowing biopolitical violence to operate covertly and deepening the clones’ self-alienation under bare life.
Keywords
- Never Let Me Go
- Prosthetic Memory
- Affective Politics
- Biopolitics
- Alienation
Preview
References
- [1] Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA, 1998.
- [2] Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. 2nd ed. Routledge, London, UK, 2014.
- [3] Freud, Sigmund. The Ego and the Id. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, USA, 1960.
- [4] Galtung, Johan. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 6, no. 3, 1969, pp. 167–191. Sage Publications, London, UK.
- [5] Ishiguro, Kazuo. Never Let Me Go. Vintage International, New York, USA, 2006.
- [6] Landsberg, Alison. Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. Columbia University Press, New York, USA, 2004.
- [7] Levy, Titus. “Human Rights Storytelling and Trauma Narrative in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Journal of Human Rights, vol. 10, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1–16. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK.
- [8] Robbins, Bruce. “Cruelty Is Bad: Banality and Proximity in Never Let Me Go.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction, vol. 40, no. 3, 2007. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
- [9] Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1985.
- [10] Toker, Leona, and Daniel Chertoff. “Reader Response and the Recycling of Topoi in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, vol. 6, no. 1, 2008, pp. 163–180. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.