A Model of Co-Creation: China's "Supply-Consumption Integration" and the Provision of International Public Goods via the Belt and Road Initiative
DOWNLOAD PDFZelin Jin
School of Political Science and International Relations, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Abstract
In an era of mounting obstacles to globalization and a sluggish global economic recovery, the international community needs sustained, stable, open, and inclusive international public goods more than ever, yet their supply is confronted with the dual dilemma of "hegemonic decline" and "multilateral failure": long-standing core suppliers no longer deliver steadily, and existing research lacks attention both to developing countries' practices and to the agency of consumers. As China has developed rapidly, the international community has voiced a variety of opinions concerning the "China responsibility theory." Taking China's Belt and Road Initiative as its point of entry, this paper argues that China, through the effective supply of international public goods, has established an innovative strategic path characterized by "supply-consumption integration."
Keywords
- International Public Goods (IPGs)
- Supply-Consumption Integration
- Path
- Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
- China's Strategy
Preview
References
- [1] Ling Feixia. Effective Globalization and Ineffective Global Governance: New Reflections of Western Scholars in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Northeast Asia Forum, 2020(5):63-75.
- [2] Paul A. Samuelson. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954,36(4):387.
- [3] James M. Buchanan. An Economic Theory of Clubs[J]. Economica, 1965,32(125):1-14.
- [4] Mancur Olson. Increasing the Incentives for International Cooperation[J]. International Organization, 1971,25(4):866-874.
- [5] Charles P. Kindleberger. International Public Goods without International Government[J]. The American Economic Review, 1986,76(1):1-13.
- [6] Robert Gilpin. War and Change in World Politics[M]. Song Xinning, et al., trans. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2019.
- [7] Robert O. Keohane. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy[M]. Su Changhe, et al., trans. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2012.
- [8] Joseph S. Nye. The Kindleberger Trap[R]. Harvard Kennedy School, 2017-01-09.
- [9] Inge Kaul. Providing Global Public Goods? Managing Globalization[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003:218-221.
- [10] Antoni Estevadeordal, et al. Regional Public Goods: From Theory to Practice[M]. Zhang Jianxin, et al., trans. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2010:12.
- [11] Cao Dejun. On China's Supply Model of Global Public Goods[J]. Strategic Decision Research, 2019(3):3-29.
- [12] Men Honghua. The 'Belt and Road' and the China-World Interactive Relationship[J]. World Economics and Politics, 2019(5):4-21.
- [13] Alvin Toffler. The Third Wave[M]. Huang Mingjian, trans. Beijing: CITIC Press, 2018:187.
- [14] Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping's Opening Remarks at the Roundtable Summit of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation[EB/OL]. Chinese Government Website, 2017-05-15.
- [15] Rafiq Dossani, Jennifer Bouey and Keren Zhu. Demystifying the Belt and Road Initiative: A Clarification of its Key Features, Objectives and Impacts[R]. RAND Corporation, 2020.
- [16] Cai Fang. The Kindleberger Trap or the Easterly Tragedy? Global Public Goods, Their Provision, and China's Approach[J]. World Economics and Politics, 2017(10):22.