NSP logoHong Kong Natural Science
Press Limited
  • HOME
  • JOURNALS
  • BOOKS
  • ABOUT
  • GUIDE
SUBMITLoginRegister

NSP logoHong Kong Natural Science
Press Limited
  • 00852-30697751
  • routhpub@163.com

Office Locations

7th Floor, Block B, New Mandarin Plaza,
14 Science Museum Road, Tsim Sha Tsui,
Kowloon, Hong Kong

Useful Links

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Books
  • About

Author Services

  • Article Processing Charges
  • Open Access Policy
  • Copyright Transfer Agreement
  • Author Contribution Statement

About

NSP stands for Hong Kong Natural Science Press. Specializing in academic publishing, we operate under an open access (OA) model and are committed to delivering high-quality academic publishing services to researchers worldwide.

Copyright © 2026 NSP unless otherwise stated
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Journals
  4. >
  5. 人文与社会科学
  6. >
  7. Volume 2026 Issue 2
Article|OPEN ACCESS

人类性内竞争性别差异

DOWNLOAD PDF

张思怡

福建师范大学

Volume
Volume 2026 Issue 2
Link
/journals/3/articles/125
DOI
10.65285/RWYSHKX.V2I2.016
Copyright
Published by NSP.

Abstract

性内竞争通常被定义为与同性竞争对手争夺配偶的策略,是进化心理学重要的研究对象,本文从进化心理学视角出发。详细分析了男女性之间不同的性内竞争过程与竞争策略,并进一步探讨性内竞争策略的情境性与相关风险。最后,本文认为,未来需要关注竞争策略的决策机制及其在非交配领域的延伸应用,以深化对人类社会行为进化的理解。

Keywords

  • 性内竞争;性别差异;进化心理学;择偶策略;竞争策略

Preview

VIEW PDF

References

  1. Abed, R. T. (1998). The sexual competition hypothesis for eating disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71, 525-547.
  2. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in realworld settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
  3. Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt,T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290-303.
  4. Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Mate-poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11(2), 65-83.
  5. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multiinformant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10 (147470491201000207).
  6. Ayers, J. D., & Goetz, A. T. (2022). Coordinated condemnation in women’s intrasexual competition. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, Article 111294.
  7. Bereczkei, T., & Mesko, N. (2006). Hair length, facial attractiveness, personality attribution: A multiple fitness model of hairdressing. Review of Psychology, 13, 35-42.
  8. Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127.
  9. Buss, D. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628.
  10. Buss, D. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
  11. Buss, D . (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(Supplement), 23-29.
  12. Buss, D., & Dedden, L. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395 - 422.
  13. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
  14. De Block, A., & Dewitte, S. (2007). Mating games: Cultural evolution and sexual selection. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 475-491.
  15. Fisher, M. (2004). Female’s intrasexual competition decreases female’s facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 271(Supplement), S283-S285.
  16. Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2009a) The influence of female attractiveness on the effectiveness of competitor derogation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 141 - 155.
  17. Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2009b). The influence of malefacial attractiveness on women’s receptivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3, 49 - 61.
  18. Fisher, M., Tran, U., & Voracek, M. (2008). The influence of relationship status, mate seeking, and sex on intrasexual competition. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 493- 508.
  19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Hess, N. & Hagen, E. (2009).
  20. Hill, S. (2007). Overestimation bias in mate competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 118-123.
  21. Leary, M. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior.
  22. Lydon, J., Meana, M., Sepinwall, D., Richards, N., & Mayman, S. (1999). The commitment calibration hypothesis: When do people devalue attractive alternatives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 152-161.
  23. Marecek, J., Fine, M., & Kidder, L. (1997). Working between worlds: Qualitative methods and social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 631-644.
  24. Palombit, R., Cheney, D., & Seyfarth, R. (2001). Femalefemale competition for men’s “friends” in wild chacma baboons, Papio cynocephalus ursinus. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1159-1171.
  25. Schmitt, D., & Buss, D. (1996). Strategic selfpromotion and competitor derogation: Sex and content effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185 - 1204.
  26. Simpson, J., Gangestad, S., & Lerma, M. (1990). Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1192-1201.
  27. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Walters, S., & Crawford, C. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5-30.
  29. White, K., & Lehman, D. (2005). Culture and social comparisons seeking: The role of self-motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 232-224.
人文与社会科学
SUBMIT

69

Accesses

59

Downloads

Key Dates

  • Published:2026-03-18 17:17:04

Recommended Articles

    View more >