实证主义社会学的争议与 Turner 的辩护探析

Abstract

在当代社会科学哲学领域，实证主义引发了广泛且激烈的争论。实证主义强调知识的客观性，主张通过观察和经验验证事实、解释理论并应用于社会改革。本文围绕学者们对实证主义社会学的不同态度展开探讨，分析了批判者指出的实证主义社会学在研究对象、研究环境、理论严谨性等方面的局限性，同时阐述了 Turner 为实证主义辩护的核心观点与相关尝试。通过对各方观点的深入剖析，本文认为 Turner 对实证主义的辩护并未完全成功，但其相关讨论为后续深入研究实证主义社会学提供了多元视角，对该领域的未来发展具有一定的启示意义。

Keywords

• 实证主义；社会学；学术争议

References

1. Bryant, J. M. (1992). Positivism redivivus? A critique of recent uncritical proposals for reforming sociological theory (and related foibles). Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 29-53.
2. Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2001). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
3. Dugger, W. M. (1983). Two twists in economic methodology: Positivism and subjectivism. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 42(1), 75-91.
4. Fuller, S. (1992). A plague on both your houses: Beyond recidivism in the sociological theory debates. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 17(1), 62-68.
5. Turner, J . H . (1985). I n defense o f positivism. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 24-30.
6. Turner, J. H. (1992). If not positivism, then why is sociology important? The Canadian Journal of Sociology/ Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 17(1), 54-61.