NSP logoHong Kong Natural Science
Press Limited
  • HOME
  • JOURNALS
  • BOOKS
  • ABOUT
  • GUIDE
SUBMITLoginRegister

NSP logoHong Kong Natural Science
Press Limited
  • 00852-30697751
  • routhpub@163.com

Office Locations

7th Floor, Block B, New Mandarin Plaza,
14 Science Museum Road, Tsim Sha Tsui,
Kowloon, Hong Kong

Useful Links

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Books
  • About

Author Services

  • Article Processing Charges
  • Open Access Policy
  • Copyright Transfer Agreement
  • Author Contribution Statement

About

NSP stands for Hong Kong Natural Science Press. Specializing in academic publishing, we operate under an open access (OA) model and are committed to delivering high-quality academic publishing services to researchers worldwide.

Copyright © 2026 NSP unless otherwise stated
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Journals
  4. >
  5. Humanities and Social Sciences
  6. >
  7. Volume 2026 Issue 3
Article|OPEN ACCESS

Bridging the Policy–Practice Gap: Framing Strategies and Policy Translation in Government Health Communication on Weight Management in China

DOWNLOAD PDF

Xinyi Dong

School of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China

Volume
Volume 2026 Issue 3
Link
/articles/189
DOI
10.65285/HSS.V2I3.002
Copyright
Published by NSP.

Abstract

As obesity and overweight have become major public health concerns, governments increasingly use digital platforms to promote preventive health policies. However, less is known about how policy objectives are translated into everyday health practices through government social media. Drawing on framing theory and the concept of policy translation, this study examines the “Science-Based Weight Loss Together” column published on the official WeChat account Healthy China. Using content analysis, 105 articles published between September 2021 and March 2026 were analyzed in terms of thematic structure, headline strategies, communication frames, and audience engagement. The findings identify a threestage framing process consisting of risk alerts, knowledge explanation, and behavioral guidance. Together, these frames facilitate the transformation of institutional primary policy objectives into practical health recommendations. Audience engagement was highest for content with strong personal relevance and practical utility, and increased during periods of heightened policy attention. The study extends framing research by conceptualising framing not only as a mechanism of meaning construction but also as a mechanism of policy translation. It further demonstrates how government social media contribute to preventive health governance by embedding policy objectives within everyday communication and behavioral practices.

Keywords

  • Health Communication
  • Government Social Media
  • Framing Theory
  • Policy Translation
  • Weight Management
  • Communication Effectiveness

Preview

VIEW PDF

References

  1. Entman RM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  2. Freeman R (2009) What is ‘translation’? Evidence & Policy 5(4):429–447. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426409X478133
  3. Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  4. Gong H (2019) How is dialogue possible? Paths and challenges of health communication research in China under social media contexts. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 41(6):6–25.
  5. Hu BJ (2012) Conceptual innovation and paradigm transformation in health communication: Public communication dilemmas and solutions in the new media era. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 34(6):6–10.
  6. Kreps GL, Thornton BC (1992) Health Communication: Theory and Practice. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL.
  7. Kuang WB, Wu XL (2019) Developing an evaluation index system for health communication effectiveness on WeChat public accounts. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 41(1):153–176.
  8. Ma HQ (2018) Health communication pathways under the Healthy China 2030 strategy. Journalism Research 4:45–52.
  9. Mergel I (2013) A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 30(4):327–334.
  10. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C (2013) A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(4):e85. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1933
  11. National Health Commission of China (2019) Healthy China Action (2019–2030). People's Publishing House, Beijing.
  12. Report on Chinese Residents’ Nutrition and Chronic Diseases (2020) Acta Nutrimenta Sinica 42(6):521.
  13. Sun CQ (2010) A review of 35 years of framing theory research and reflections on its development in mainland China. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 32(9):18–24.
  14. Xinhua News Agency (2016) Healthy China 2030 Planning Outline. Available at: https://www.xinhuanet.com. Accessed 10 Mar 2026.
  15. Yu GM (2013) Theoretical construction and practical approaches to health communication. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 35(3):6–15.
  16. Zhong RX, Ma XY, Liang N et al. (2018) Publication patterns and dissemination effects of public health WeChat articles. Chinese Journal of Health Education 34(9):800–803.
Humanities and Social Sciences
SUBMIT

58

Accesses

52

Downloads

Key Dates

  • Published:2026-07-24 14:33:46

Recommended Articles

    View more >